Through a public statement, the union reported instances of legal irregularities and pressure from the central level, which changes the results of the assessment locally, "the constitution of the third ICSARA and are public knowledge as it is in the SEIA is the result of pressure from the Executive Directorate and the Office and do not represent the actual work delivered by workers in the region," they say. ..
PUBLIC STATEMENT
A national community and especially the aysenina:
Unions of Workers of the National Forestry Corporation (CONAF) Aysen Region and the National Union of Professional National Forestry Corporation, come in to legal irregularities and public pressures that have been subjected in the first instance and then surreptitiously explicitly in the environmental assessment process Aysén Hydroelectric Project (PHA), which is summarized below:
FIRST: Through Note No. 510 of the Regional Bureau for CONAF Aysen, dated October 7, 2008, is pronouncement Delivery System Environmental Impact Assessment which is disagreement, this means, both the study and the environmental permit PAS 102 sector suffers from technical information relevant and essential to environmentally qualify the project and concluded that there is clear breach of environmental regulation that applies to the Laguna San Rafael National Park, Bernardo O'Higgins National Park and Forest Reserve Lake Cochrane and forest ecosystems in the area of \u200b\u200binfluence.
however, was not served, nor is there, the option of disagreement in the SEIA-mail to Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA), and according to instructions from CONAMA, the report of delivery of CONAF joined the SEIA- addresses in the format "With Remarks." Had there been the first option, would have led to the Addendum regarding comments made by CONAF.
SECOND: In response to the Addendum N ° 1, CONAF responds Note No. 450 of the Regional Bureau for CONAF Aysen, dated 10/11/2009 where some observations are censored and / or taken out of context by CONAMA (this is easily verifiable by checking the website of the SEIA and what goes against existing legislation), which was observed at this institution, both by the Regional Directorate of Conaf, through the Office N ° 64 dated 11/02/2010 and the Executive Director for Office No. 85, 26/02/2010.
It should be noted that answers your second ICSARA CONAMA taking 127 days to do so, subtracting days for further comments and possible rejection.
What accounts for the irregularities of the CONAMA in their performances, in fact it was the organization called upon to ensure the legality of the process.
THIRD: In response to Addendum No. 2 regional professionals said that while the PHA intends to undertake works or flood area as part of the Laguna San Rafael National Park or other area in the same category of protection, that is, activities that constitute a holding commercial purposes is contrary to existing legislation, especially the so-called Washington Convention and you can not leave the technical subject, so they think should be refused permission sector (PAS 102).
Nevertheless, the final wording of the statement of CONAF is imposed by Directorate CONAF executive, in Santiago, determining the Environmental Sector Plan (SAP 102) and authorizing the possible flooding of 18.8 hectares in Laguna San Rafael National Park.
For the foregoing is that CONAF workers, through their Trade Unions and Professional state:
1. The Trade Unions and Professional National Forestry Corporation CONAF Aysen Region manifest to the public workers who participated in the evaluations of PHA have done an evaluation in accordance with professional ethics and adherence to the laws that say the laws that govern them.
2. Responses issued by the institution for the establishment of the third ICSARA and that are public knowledge as it is in the SEIA is the result of pressure from the Executive Directorate and the Office and do not represent the actual work delivered by workers in the region. Which had been "targeted" by the legal staff at the central level that was present in the Region, to direct the work. Mode that has been used in other regions of the country.
3. The unions concerned that the public want to know about these acts of power that does not contribute to good environmental policy development and sector and expense put into the technical and professional workers.
José Velásquez Oyarzo , President Union of Aysén Conaf
Sagredo Jorge Martínez, President of the National Union of Professional Conaf
PUBLIC STATEMENT
A national community and especially the aysenina:
Unions of Workers of the National Forestry Corporation (CONAF) Aysen Region and the National Union of Professional National Forestry Corporation, come in to legal irregularities and public pressures that have been subjected in the first instance and then surreptitiously explicitly in the environmental assessment process Aysén Hydroelectric Project (PHA), which is summarized below:
FIRST: Through Note No. 510 of the Regional Bureau for CONAF Aysen, dated October 7, 2008, is pronouncement Delivery System Environmental Impact Assessment which is disagreement, this means, both the study and the environmental permit PAS 102 sector suffers from technical information relevant and essential to environmentally qualify the project and concluded that there is clear breach of environmental regulation that applies to the Laguna San Rafael National Park, Bernardo O'Higgins National Park and Forest Reserve Lake Cochrane and forest ecosystems in the area of \u200b\u200binfluence.
however, was not served, nor is there, the option of disagreement in the SEIA-mail to Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA), and according to instructions from CONAMA, the report of delivery of CONAF joined the SEIA- addresses in the format "With Remarks." Had there been the first option, would have led to the Addendum regarding comments made by CONAF.
SECOND: In response to the Addendum N ° 1, CONAF responds Note No. 450 of the Regional Bureau for CONAF Aysen, dated 10/11/2009 where some observations are censored and / or taken out of context by CONAMA (this is easily verifiable by checking the website of the SEIA and what goes against existing legislation), which was observed at this institution, both by the Regional Directorate of Conaf, through the Office N ° 64 dated 11/02/2010 and the Executive Director for Office No. 85, 26/02/2010.
It should be noted that answers your second ICSARA CONAMA taking 127 days to do so, subtracting days for further comments and possible rejection.
What accounts for the irregularities of the CONAMA in their performances, in fact it was the organization called upon to ensure the legality of the process.
THIRD: In response to Addendum No. 2 regional professionals said that while the PHA intends to undertake works or flood area as part of the Laguna San Rafael National Park or other area in the same category of protection, that is, activities that constitute a holding commercial purposes is contrary to existing legislation, especially the so-called Washington Convention and you can not leave the technical subject, so they think should be refused permission sector (PAS 102).
Nevertheless, the final wording of the statement of CONAF is imposed by Directorate CONAF executive, in Santiago, determining the Environmental Sector Plan (SAP 102) and authorizing the possible flooding of 18.8 hectares in Laguna San Rafael National Park.
For the foregoing is that CONAF workers, through their Trade Unions and Professional state:
1. The Trade Unions and Professional National Forestry Corporation CONAF Aysen Region manifest to the public workers who participated in the evaluations of PHA have done an evaluation in accordance with professional ethics and adherence to the laws that say the laws that govern them.
2. Responses issued by the institution for the establishment of the third ICSARA and that are public knowledge as it is in the SEIA is the result of pressure from the Executive Directorate and the Office and do not represent the actual work delivered by workers in the region. Which had been "targeted" by the legal staff at the central level that was present in the Region, to direct the work. Mode that has been used in other regions of the country.
3. The unions concerned that the public want to know about these acts of power that does not contribute to good environmental policy development and sector and expense put into the technical and professional workers.
José Velásquez Oyarzo , President Union of Aysén Conaf
Sagredo Jorge Martínez, President of the National Union of Professional Conaf
0 comments:
Post a Comment